18
2008
Posted by @ 11:49
As you guys know by now, the Sorprano Court of the United Socialist States of Amerika ruled in favor of allowing B. HUSSEIN!!!  Obambi to steal the Ohio election, making things that much more difficult for John McCain to win.  Other battleground states are very likely to follow.
(Malkin has more here.)
What really pisses me off about this, though, is that it was all the Supreme Whores™ who heard the appeal – and:
There were no dissents so evidently Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas agreed.
So I guess it’s now “let every vote count, even the illegal ones”.  Even for treasonous bastards on whom we thought  we could rely.
Nine ropes.  Nine trees.  Plenty of “ventilation facilitators” for afterwards.
You know the drill.
Notice: compact(): Undefined variable: limits in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 853
Notice: compact(): Undefined variable: groupby in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 853
Notice: compact(): Undefined variable: limits in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 853
Notice: compact(): Undefined variable: groupby in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 853
Notice: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4027
5 responses to “Laws against stealing elections:  Void where prohibited by Soprano fiat”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Um…check your facts.
The Supreme Court (which isn’t) did NOT rule that it was okay for Ohio to not check voter registration. It ruled that the Republican Party of Ohio had no legal standing to challenge the State of Ohio’s decision to not check voter registration. There is HUUUUUUGE legal difference between the two.
In the first (actual) instance, the Supreme Court (which isn’t) ruled that the suit could not have been brought, because the plaintiff had no right to sue.
In the second (hypothetical) instance, the Supreme Court (which isn’t) would have ruled that Ohio had the right to not bother enforcing Federal law. Don’t blow a gasket over something that didn’t actually happen. Save your outrage for the things that actually HAVE happened.
We have enough to worry about without making things up.
And that ruling, my friend, is abject bullshit.  If people who have a vested interest in a fair election can’t “petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (Article I, Bill of Rights), why the hell is the amendment there in the first place?
Remember, this is the same bunch of black-robed tyrants who would rather reference “international law” than its own constitution.
The Republican Party of Ohio is NOT ‘the people’. It is a corporate entity (meaning, a legal fiction created for the purposes of risk management) who did NOT have legal standing to sue the State of Ohio for election shenanigans. A VOTER in the Republican Party of Ohio has legal standing to sue, based on the Ohio VOTER wanting the Attorney General of Ohio to, you know…actually do her JOB. Don’t buy into the liberal bullshit of “anyone can sue on behalf of anyone or anything else”.
The Supreme Court ruled that a legal fiction did not have the legal standing to sue a state on behalf of the voters of that state. The residents of that state, on the other hand, DO have the right to sue.
It was explicitly stated in the Supreme Court’s (which isn’t) ruling that they were NOT ruling on the merits of the case, ONLY whether or not the Republican Party of Ohio had the right to sue.
The ruling was correct. Stop getting frantic over correct rulings. We have quite enough to worry about without making stuff up.
Okay, HDD, show me – seeing as you know these things and all – where exactly does it say in the US Constitution exactly who can sue and who can’t?
What actually has  happened is that ACORN has been given more “standing” and rights in the state of Ohio than an actual, organized political party.  A party which, by the way, happens to be made up of people  who don’t want to see this election stolen from them, but now can’t do squat to stop it, because the Supreme Whores said they couldn’t.
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF OHIO IS A LEGAL FICTION! IT DOES NOT ‘EXIST’ IN ANY REAL WAY!
EVERY corporation, club, activist group, community organization, mutual fund, stock brokerage, bank, etc., is a legal fiction that has legal standing to sue only insofar as the law allows them to sue. Under the specific law that the Republican Party of Ohio sued under, they did not have legal standing to sue. The Supreme Court (which isn’t) specifically ruled only on the Republican Party of Ohio’s right sue, NOT on the merits of the case! GAH!
Here I was, working under the assumption that you believed in the Rule of Law. Guess I was mistaken. You appear to only want the Supreme Court (which isn’t) to be judicial activists when it suits YOUR opinion.