Local time where you're at. ("Where you're at"?)

I guess the heterophobe community thinks that they’re going to take a page out of Goebbels’ playbook:&#160 Inundate skulls full o’ mush (a little paraphrased Rush lingo, there) with bullshit long enough, and said skulls will come to believe the memes as truth twoof.

Obviously, they’ve never met me.&#160

So here comes the latest round of sodomite bullshit in the form of a movie, the title of which (“For the Bible Tells Me So”) seeks to co-opt a part of one of the first songs you ever learn in Sunday School – thus proving the old axiom that when limp-wristed heterophobic liberal shits hit rock bottom when it comes to depravity, the first thing they’ll do is pull out their trusty jackhammers.

MERLIN:&#160 Ew.

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 Gross.

KORRIOTH:&#160 Tell me that wasn’t intentional, m’Liege.

LSIK&T:&#160 Well, no…but you gotta admit…

“For the Bible Tells Me So,” a documentary that seeks to make the case that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality

Which, if you go by the dictionary definition of the word, disqualifies it on that basis alone.

is making the rounds at film festivals and screening in select cities.

Naturally.&#160 Cities like San Transexual, no doubt.&#160 Film festivals like Sundance & Cannes.&#160 That is&#160 where the Scum Of The Earth™ hang out after all, isn’t it?

The 97-minute film weaves biblical analysis with the stories of five Christian families who learn that one of their children is gay.

Two of the families are well known: former House Democratic Leader Dick Gephardt, whose daughter Chrisy is a lesbian, and Episcopal Bishop V. Gene Robinson, who made headlines as the church’s first openly gay bishop.

Well, I certainly doubt anyone expected to see Vice President Cheney there, after all.

Or maybe they could get the offspring of Gerry Studds or Bonnie Fwank Barney Frank to come testify.

What?&#160 They don’t have&#160 any offspring?&#160 Fancy that.&#160 Who knew?&#160

The documentary traces each family’s experience of wrestling with how their child’s sexuality fits in with their moral and religious beliefs. Some come to accept it

Translation:&#160 Some are browbeaten, harassed and ridiculed into accepting it.

others learn to love their children while continuing to believe homosexuality is wrong.

Now this is the biggest crock of shit I’ve heard in…well, since the last rant I wrote.&#160 Parents don’t stop loving their children when they decide to become flaming swishy pond scum (or any other&#160 time they royally screw up, for that matter), contrary to what GLAAD and P-FAGGOT P-FLAG would have you believe.

On the other hand, said parents probably should have knocked the shit out of any kid of theirs who even thought&#160 about any same-sex humping.&#160 Who knows, maybe that 1% might’ve become a .002 percent, hm?

One parent’s strained relationship with her daughter ends with the girl’s suicide. That mother, Mary Lou Wallner, became a gay rights activist.

Ohhhhh.&#160 Such a touching gesture.&#160 Such a noble creature.

Such a fucking idiot bimbo.

“The gay kids are in the film, but it’s really about those parents,” said the film’s director, Daniel Karslake, at a discussion following the film’s Washington premiere.

In other words, it’s all about bringing pressure to bear on a group of supposedly weak-minded and linguini-spined fools until they either bend to the will of the heterophobes or demonstrate their unwillingness to do so, earning the scorn of the flaming limp-wrists.

The decision to focus on the parents was strategic.

“The film was made with a conservative Christian audience in mind,” Karslake said. His expectation was that those viewers would identify with the parents in the film as they struggled to reconcile their faith with the sexuality of their children.

Translation:&#160 we’re going to keep beating you Bible-thumpers about the head and shoulders, and stay in your face until we break you and force you to say that what we do is perfectly acceptable in your eyes.

You’re going to be at it a looooooong time, assclowns.&#160 Because as long as I have breath & life, I will never bow to your pressure.

I’ve said it here previously, and I’ll say it now & forevermore:&#160 It’s not my tolerance&#160 you want – it’s my acceptance.&#160 You want me to say that what you bastards do is perfectly okay – and so help me God, you will never&#160 get me to say that.

Ever.

The film has already won a number of awards, including the HBO Audience Award at the Provincetown Film Festival and the Audience Award for Best Documentary at the Seattle International Film Festival. It was also nominated for the Grand Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival.

Of course it’s winning “awards”.&#160 It sucks up to every leftist retard that side of John-John “Silky Pony” Edwards.&#160 Yer damned right&#160 it’s gonna win “awards”.&#160 Hell – I’d be worried if the fuckheads at Conned & Sun-dunce didn’t&#160 like it.

In addition to the families’ stories, the documentary features religious leaders, including retired Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu and the Rev. Peter Gnomes of Harvard University discussing biblical views of homosexuality.

Oh, now there’s&#160 a pair of ringing endorsements.

MERLIN:&#160 Didn’t you put Harvard over in your run-in with He Who Majored In Coffee-Brewing In Seattle™?

LSIK&T:&#160 Yeah.&#160 And he made the point…

KORRIOTH:&#160 …that not every Harvard degree program was worth its weight in gold.

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 Well, yeah, but you’re talking normal degree programs like Business & English, aren’t you?&#160 M’Liege, you certainly don’t hold a Harvard “reverend” over Paige Patterson of SW Baptist Seminary, do you?

LSIK&T:&#160 No, and if you ever imply otherwise, you’ll join a certain pair of individuals in the airlock.

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 EEEEEEP!!! (scurries away)

MERLIN:&#160 So Allyn-the-Asshat-Who-Won’t-Go-Away™ has a point.

LSIK&T:&#160 Eh.&#160 I’ll give him .33 points for that one.

MERLIN:&#160 Damn, you’re a tough crowd!

LSIK&T:&#160 Flattery will get you nowhere, Wizard.

ALL:&#160

They maintain that biblical passages typically used to suggest homosexuality is sinful have been misinterpreted or distorted.

Hmmm.&#160 They must have missed the part of the Bible that says that all Scripture is inspired of God.

MERLIN:&#160 Isn’t this the same mindset that completely ignores the Free Exercise clause of the First Amendment?

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 And the “shall-not-be-infringed” part of the Second?

LSIK&T:&#160 Now, now, boys.&#160 Can’t let little things like Constitutional passages get in the way of their little leftard agenda.

MERLIN:&#160 Of course not.&#160 Wouldn’t be sporting.

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 (snort)

The film argues against a literal interpretation of Scripture and for one that considers the text’s historical context.

You’d argue against a literal interpretation, too, if you couldn’t handle the fact that rejection of the Book’s central character meant a one-way ticket to Hell and separation from Creator God.&#160 Anything to keep from having to face the fact that your best efforts are as filthy rags before the sight of the Lord.&#160 (Which is true for all of us, yours truly included, so that part’s not personal, mkay?)

With such a reading, the film says, many of the passages used to condemn homosexuality turn out to be about something else.

For example, some scholars say the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was failure to take in travelers, not homosexuality.

MERLIN:&#160 Oh, Great Honkin’ Cthulu, not that&#160 ancient meme again?!?!&#160 Hell, that was Lancelot’s&#160 favorite argument, for Gawd’s sake!

T-BONE MCMANX:&#160 What part of “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination” do they not understand?

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 Can’t they come up with something original???

KORRIOTH:&#160 We are&#160 talking liberals here, Lieutenant.

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 But don’t they ever learn, Captain???

LSIK&T:&#160 That’s why they’re liberals, Ozy.&#160 Not capable.

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 Oh.

Richard Mouw, the president of Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena , Calif. , is the one critical voice in the film, disputing the theory about Sodom and Gomorrah . One couple, Brenda and David Poteat, remain uncomfortable with their daughter’s sexuality.

MERLIN:&#160 Ah yes, the token homophobes.

LSIK&T:&#160 Gotta be fair, y’know.

KORRIOTH:&#160 (grunt)

Though filmmakers attempted to get evangelical leaders who hold the literalist view to appear in the film, they all declined, said Robin Voss, one of the film’s executive producers.

And can anyone blame them?&#160 Would you&#160 want to walk into an ambush where every syllable you uttered would face microscope-caliber scrutiny for signs of real or perceived bigotry?&#160 Does Bambi deliberately wander into a lion’s den?

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 Well…

LSIK&T:&#160 And survive?

OZY MCCOOL:&#160 Point.

Instead of interviewing biblical literalists, the film relies on archival footage of their sermons and television appearances.

Yes, where the filmmakers get to pour over every word, looking for the one blurb onto which the heterophobic Left can latch and bring them down or make them look foolish.

MERLIN:&#160 Sounds like the Spanish Inquisition to me.

LSIK&T:&#160 Or 60 Minutes.&#160 Your choice.

MERLIN:&#160 Point.

The documentary includes a light-hearted animated segment asserting that homosexuality is not a choice, and should not be confronted with therapies that attempt to treat or change it.

And here the writer of this piece of shit tome shows her bias towards heterosexuals, for if the church came out with a “light-hearted animated segment asserting” that sodomites aren’t&#160 “born that way”, said segment would immediately be castigated as being homophobic and bigoted.&#160 Hell, maybe racist & sexist, too, who knows?

Much of the film’s analysis of Scripture was based on seminars given by the Rev. Steve Kindle, a Disciples of Christ pastor and the founder of Clergy United for the Equality of Homosexuals.

Knock me over with a feather.&#160 A pro-faggot analysis of Scripture rendered by an asshole who’s pro-faggot.&#160 Cue Gilbert Gottfried.

MERLIN:&#160 Gilbert Gottfried?

LSIK&T:&#160 “Why am I not surprised?”

MERLIN:&#160 Oh.

Voss and her friend Keith Lewis were inspired to make a movie about the Bible’s take on homosexuality after attending one of these seminars in 2003.

Karslake, meanwhile, was working on “In the Life,” a PBS news show geared toward a gay and lesbian audience. Karslake came on as the film’s director.

Birds of a rainbow feather.&#160 Asshats, all.

Though reasonably respectful of the opposing point of view

You mean, we’re only referred to as “breeders” five&#160 times, as opposed to ten?

the film is likely to attract an audience already open to the idea of Scripture and homosexuality being compatible.

“We’ll have trouble getting some people who are strident in their views to go,” Voss said.

NAWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!&#160 You think???

Fucking retarded heterophobic pissweasels.

Notice: compact(): Undefined variable: limits in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 853

Notice: compact(): Undefined variable: groupby in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 853

Notice: compact(): Undefined variable: limits in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 853

Notice: compact(): Undefined variable: groupby in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 853

Notice: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /home/sysop284/domains/spatulacitybbs.net/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4027

6 responses to ““A lie told oft enough…” (Heterophobe version)”

1. David Hartung says:

   November 1, 2007 at 5:03 pm

   Their first mistake is to deny the infallibility and innerrancy of the scriptures.

   II Timothy 3:16-17
   16All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

   Log in to Reply
2. Robert Huntingdon says:

   November 1, 2007 at 6:45 pm

   And, David, they forget something else — at the time those words were written, THERE WAS NO NEW TESTAMENT! It was still being written, so the only “scripture” they could look at for guidance as to whether homosexuality was wrong was the OT.

   And about the only way the OT could be more clear would be for it to explicitly list every act of homosexuality in a big long list and say “this and any similar act is absolutely forbidden”.

   Good luck getting any of them to admit that.

   RH

   Log in to Reply
3. Alan K. Henderson says:

   November 2, 2007 at 2:00 am

   For those of you who brought your Bibles, turn to Matthew 19:4-5, where Jesus says:

   “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?

   Since Jesus defines marriage in exclusively heterosexual terms, and since the Bible consistently has uncomplimentary things to say about sex outside of marriage…

   Log in to Reply
4. David Hartung says:

   November 2, 2007 at 6:33 am

   Alan said:
   “Since Jesus defines marriage in exclusively heterosexual terms, and since the Bible consistently has uncomplimentary things to say about sex outside of marriage…”

   One of the tactics of the pro-homosexuality bunch is to deny the Bible’s condemnation of Homosexuality. If you talk to these people, they will tell you that not only does the Bible *not* condemn homosexuality, but that David and Jonathan were lovers. They will also tell you that since there was a disciple whom Jesus loved, that Jesus was homosexual.

   Bottom line, these folks will do anything to advance their goal.

   Log in to Reply
5. Robert Huntingdon says:

   November 2, 2007 at 5:43 pm

   I wonder if any of them bother to check the Greek word used in the phrase “the disciple whom Jesus loved”. Well maybe not wonder, as I’d say the odds are somewhere around a million to one against. But for the curious, it’s agapao, derived from agape, which is NEVER used in the Bible (or period literature that I am aware of) for any kind of sexual or even romantic love. Of course, they wouldn’t dream of letting facts get in the way of a good agenda… 🙂

   RH

   Log in to Reply
6. Blackiswhite, Imperial Agent Provocateur says:

   November 3, 2007 at 9:37 am

   “They maintain that biblical passages typically used to suggest homosexuality is sinful have been misinterpreted or distorted.”

   UNREAL. *walks away shaking head*

   Log in to Reply