Yes, Denizens - I know it's Cafe Press. Yes, I know that they're a liberal-owned company. Yes, I'm aware that the quality of their garments may not be quite as good as ThoseShirts.com.
But unlike ThoseShirts.com, Cafe Press ACTUALLY ANSWERS THE EMAIL I SEND THEM!!!!
Got clue, ThoseShirts???
Local time where you're at. ("Where you're at"?)
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Questions?
Comments?
Want an account here?
Warning: Emails are fodder for the blog. IOW, if you want your email kept private, you must tell me in the email.
Otherwise, it's mine to do with as I please, and if I want to use it on the blog, I'm perfectly free to do so.
You have now been warned.
Hmmm, what am I getting this year, Dad?
Thank you, Algore.
(snicker)
Number of visitors since January 27, 2004
View My Stats
Well, thanks to another roving band of black-robed, tyrannical jackals, CBS got away with showing us Janet Jackson’s tit.
A federal appeals court on Monday threw out a $550,000 indecency fine against CBS Corp. for the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show that ended with Janet Jackson’s breast-baring “wardrobe malfunction.”
The three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission “acted arbitrarily and capriciously” in issuing the fine for the fleeting image of nudity.
Yeah, just like Justin Timberjerk “acted arbitrarily and capriciously” in doing his part to try and “bring sexy back”?
The 90 million people watching the Super Bowl, many of them children, heard Justin Timberlake sing, “Gonna have you naked by the end of this song,” as he reached for Jackson’s bustier.
The court found that the FCC deviated from its nearly 30-year practice of fining indecent broadcast programming only when it was so “pervasive as to amount to ‘shock treatment’ for the audience.”
I dunno about you, but I’d think showing 90 million people, a damned good portion of which were kids, for Cthulu’s sake, was sufficiently “pervasive” as to comprise “shock value”. I don’t see any deviation from the FCC’s practice there.
Then again, I’ve never sat in a star chamber like these three fuckwits have, so my brain hasn’t ever had that glorious opportunity to rot.
In a statement Monday, CBS said it hoped the decision “will lead the FCC to return to the policy of restrained indecency enforcement it followed for decades.”
“This is an important win for the entire broadcasting industry because it recognizes that there are rare instances, particularly during live programming, when it may not be possible to block unfortunate fleeting material, despite best efforts,” the network said.
Oh, hell, See-BS, why don’t we just turn every broadcast network into the Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler channels, eh? Maybe we can have a channel for stoners & faggots too, huh?
MERLIN: We already have Bravo and MTV.
LSIK&T: Oh. Yeah, we do, don’t we?
Black-robed shitheels. 
1 Comment to ““Miss Nasty” gets away with it”
Write a comment
You need to login, m'liege.
- _______________
- This blog is best viewed with your eyes.
- It helps, though, if you have Microsoft Internet Explorer
set about 1024x7681280x1024 with your Favorites windowactivated on the leftdeactivated. (At least until I can get a better handle on how WordPress works.)
(KORRIOTH: Oh, great. More wormholes.)
Mozilla Firefox doesn't do too badly, either; in fact, it's His Rudeness' browser of choice. -
You can use
Nutscrape,
if you so desire - but why in blazes would you want to use a browser from a company that had to hide behind Janet El Reño's skirt to be successful?
And don't even get me started on Opera or Chrome. I'm not about to trust any browser that won't let me change its color scheme.
[...] really?  Someone wanna tell me where these Demoscum were when See-BS was getting off scot-fucking-free over Janet Jackson’s little “wardrobe malfunction”?  Anyone?  [...]